modified 5/20/2000

Go to the Pure Foods / Organic Consumers' Association webpage. They will print and mail your comments to the USDA, since USDA are too scared to put out an email address for fear of an even greater inundation of comments than they received the last time they tried to undermine the organic food standard. Your comments are needed to make them listen! On the OCA page, look for BioDemocracy News #26, which has a good listing of what is wrong with the current proposal.

"We need to bury the USDA once again with thousands of comments to keep them on track. Otherwise we may be confronted by a final set of federal regulations early next year which restricts organic agriculture to a small niche market and opens the door for biotech and factory farm special interests to control the alternative food network which is rapidly expanding across the US."


A few of the problems with the new (March 2000) proposed rules, from the report of Jim Riddle of Organic Independents

Subpart G - Administrative. Compliance. 205.660. Does not address
investigation of non-certified operations making "organic" claims.

Subpart G - Administrative. Compliance. 205.662(e). No penalties are
assigned other than suspension and de-certification.

Subpart G - Administrative. Compliance. Funding for investigation and
enforcement action is not addressed.

Subpart G - Administrative. Inspection and Testing. 205.670(b) states that
residue tests must be conducted at the certifier s "own expense".

Subpart G - Administrative. Inspection and Testing. 205.671 sets maximum
allowable residue levels at "estimated national mean" without providing
information on what those levels are.

Subpart G - Administrative. Inspection and Testing. Provides no protection
of organic producers from chemical or genetic trespass; liability for
damages is not addressed.

Subpart G - Administrative. Inspection and Testing. Does not set or propose
any rejection levels for GMO contamination.

3/20 Deadline for comment: Action Alert: Monsanto's Latest GE Corn

FDA hearings on GE food in Chicago (11/18/99), Washington DC (11/30/99) and Oakland (12/13/99). BE THERE! Register in advance to speak.  And/or write letters!   -->Details<--

Write to Consumer Reports about their GE article

FDA COMMENT PERIOD ON PROPOSAL TO ALLOW NO LABELING OF IRRADIATED FOODS TO EXPIRE!   Comment period will END July 19, 1999.

See the NOP's "Important Notices" page for their latest proclamation.         The latest past deadline was 12/14/98 -- see here for details on that.

LAST CALL FOR ANTI-GE PETITIONS FROM MOTHERS FOR NATURAL LAW AND THE CONSUMER RIGHT TO KNOW CAMPAIGN!      (To be presented June 17, 1999)

May 3, 1999: HAVE YOUR SAY WITH THE FDA
The Food and Drug Administration is coming to Oakland on May 12 to hold two community Town Hall Meetings at the State Building Auditorium, 1515 Clay Street from 10am-1pm and 4-7pm. The FDA wants to hear from the community how it can improve service and outreach mechanisms to its constituents. So if you work with or represent clients who are affected by FDA policies (think drug trials, drug approvals, nutritional labeling and food safety) this is your chance to voice your concerns. We know public testimony is daunting, but how often does an opportunity to be heard by a huge government agency in a forum like this come around? Don't miss this chance. Contact Mary Ellen Taylor at 510-337-6888 for information regarding comments, testimony or special accommodations.


--Organic Consumers' Association 
Join now!

 
--Save the Dietary Supplement Health Education Act (DSHEA) 
Deadline August 25/27, 1998 
                        Comment Period
                        is officially over,
                        but your voice can
                        still make a difference!

go here for more information on DSHEA


 

Back to Save Endangered Organics page

To Storm Center